MSME Payment Rule 2026: Section 37(2)(g), Old 43B(h), 15/45-Day Limit & Tax Disallowance

For TY 2026-27, the well-known MSME delayed-payment tax rule continues under section 37(2)(g) of the Income-tax Act, 2025. It carries forward the core principle readers knew from old section 43B(h): an amount payable to a qualifying micro or small enterprise beyond the payment period permitted by section 15 of the MSMED Act is allowed as a deduction only on actual payment.

Quick answer

  • The rule covers dues to qualifying micro and small enterprises; medium enterprises are outside this specific disallowance.
  • Without a written agreement, the MSMED framework generally works with a 15-day payment period from acceptance/deemed acceptance.
  • With a written agreement, the agreed period cannot exceed 45 days from acceptance/deemed acceptance.
  • If the permitted period is crossed, deduction moves to the tax year of actual payment.
  • The normal return-filing-date relaxation does not rescue a payment already delayed beyond the MSMED deadline.
  • From 1 April 2025, revised MSME classification thresholds apply.

Old Section 43B(h) vs current Section 37(2)(g)

LawProvisionCore treatment
Income-tax Act, 1961Section 43B(h)Delayed dues to micro/small enterprises allowed only on actual payment.
Income-tax Act, 2025Section 37(2)(g)Corresponding actual-payment rule for qualifying delayed MSME dues.

Which suppliers are covered?

The tax disallowance is linked to a supplier that qualifies as a micro or small enterprise under the MSMED framework. Medium enterprises do not fall within this particular clause. Finance teams should therefore avoid using a generic “MSME = covered” flag.

The revised MSME classification effective from 1 April 2025 uses composite investment and turnover criteria:

CategoryInvestment ceilingTurnover ceiling
Micro₹2.5 crore₹10 crore
Small₹25 crore₹100 crore
Medium₹125 crore₹500 crore

For tax-working purposes, collect the supplier's current Udyam registration/classification and retain evidence applicable to the relevant period. Do not infer status merely from invoice size or vendor turnover known informally.

15 days vs 45 days

The payment trigger comes from section 15 of the MSMED Act. Where there is no written agreement, payment is generally required before the appointed day, commonly understood as the statutory 15-day period from acceptance/deemed acceptance. Where a written agreement exists, payment can follow the agreed date, but the agreed period cannot exceed 45 days from acceptance/deemed acceptance.

The relevant date is not always the invoice date. Delivery, service completion, acceptance, deemed acceptance and any written objection may affect the computation. This is why a proper MSME ageing report should capture more than invoice date and due date from the vendor master.

Why 31 March creates confusion

An unpaid MSME creditor at year-end is not automatically disallowed. The key question is whether the statutory payment period has expired.

Example: due date after year-end

A small enterprise invoice is accepted on 10 March 2027 and a valid written agreement provides 45 days' credit. The permitted due date falls after 31 March. If the buyer pays within that 45-day period, the expense should not be treated as delayed merely because it remained in creditors on 31 March.

Example: already overdue before year-end

A micro supplier's invoice is accepted on 1 February 2027 with no written credit agreement. If the statutory payment deadline expires and the buyer still has not paid by year-end, the deduction can be deferred until the tax year in which actual payment is made.

Return due date does not cure the delay

The special MSME clause is stricter than several other actual-payment items. Once the relevant micro/small enterprise payment has crossed the MSMED Act deadline, paying it before the income-tax return due date does not automatically restore deduction to the earlier year. Track such amounts separately so they are claimed in the year of actual payment.

Year-end finance and tax-audit workflow

  1. Obtain Udyam details from relevant vendors.
  2. Classify micro, small and medium suppliers separately.
  3. Capture delivery/service completion and acceptance dates.
  4. Capture written credit terms.
  5. Compute the statutory 15/45-day deadline vendor-wise.
  6. Identify invoices overdue at year-end.
  7. Reconcile the disallowance working with trade creditors and expense ledgers.
  8. Track amounts disallowed in prior years and paid in the current year.
  9. Review MSMED interest exposure separately from income-tax deduction.
  10. Retain the Udyam evidence and ageing working with the tax file.

Common mistakes

  • Treating medium enterprises as covered by the same tax clause.
  • Using invoice date mechanically instead of acceptance/deemed acceptance facts.
  • Assuming every 31 March outstanding is disallowed.
  • Assuming payment before the ITR due date always saves the deduction.
  • Failing to track prior-year disallowances for deduction in the year of payment.
  • Using old MSME classification limits after 1 April 2025.
  • Ignoring written objections/disputes that may affect acceptance timing.

Frequently asked questions

Does section 37(2)(g) apply to medium enterprises?

No. The specific actual-payment rule refers to qualifying micro and small enterprises.

Is every MSME balance outstanding on 31 March disallowed?

No. The relevant question is whether the applicable statutory 15/45-day payment period has been crossed.

What are the current MSME classification limits?

From 1 April 2025, micro is up to ₹2.5 crore investment and ₹10 crore turnover; small up to ₹25 crore and ₹100 crore; medium up to ₹125 crore and ₹500 crore.

Can payment before the ITR due date avoid disallowance?

Not where the amount has already crossed the MSMED Act payment deadline. The MSME clause is excluded from the normal return-due-date relaxation.

Official references

Last reviewed: 22 August 2026. Verify the supplier's classification, acceptance date and written credit terms before finalising any disallowance.